<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ann Wolfson Associates &#187; author3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annwolfson.com/author/author3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annwolfson.com</link>
	<description>Ann Wolfson Associates - Financial Planning Consultants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Long-Term Care, Life Insurance, and Asset Preservation</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/insurance-and-annuities/long-term-care-life-insurance-and-asset-preservation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/insurance-and-annuities/long-term-care-life-insurance-and-asset-preservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance and Annuities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Finally &#8212; a plan that provides long-term care coverage, asset control and preservation, and a death benefit!</p>
<p>Increasingly, seniors are aware of their need for long-term care insurance. However, paying expensive premiums for insurance remains a burden, especially with the cost of premiums rises as a person advances in years.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/insurance-and-annuities/long-term-care-life-insurance-and-asset-preservation/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally &#8212; a plan that provides long-term care coverage, asset control and preservation, and a death benefit!</p>
<p>Increasingly, seniors are aware of their need for long-term care insurance. However, paying expensive premiums for insurance remains a burden, especially with the cost of premiums rises as a person advances in years.</p>
<p>Now a three-dimensional policy is available: (1) it offers a death benefit that passes to beneficiaries income-tax free, thus providing a wealth-transfer vehicle for estate planning; (2) the accumulated value of the policy continues to function as a savings vehicle from which needed funds can be withdrawn; and (3) the policy provides long-term care, which many people need, especially in later life.</p>
<p>An added bonus is that the policy offers a guaranteed return of premium, minus any long-term benefits paid out.</p>
<p>Call Ann Wolfson Associates to find out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/insurance-and-annuities/long-term-care-life-insurance-and-asset-preservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Forecast</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/stocks-bonds-and-funds/economic-forecast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/stocks-bonds-and-funds/economic-forecast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stocks, Bonds and Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Economic Outlook &#8212; Better than Expected</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Economists closely examine how economic data differs from their forecasts, and draw inferences from these deviations. For example, should retail sales rise 0.4%, compared to forecasts of 0.2%, economists might opine that consumers were more positive, spent a little more and thus growth might be a little better than what was previously expected. Not a big surprise on the upside, but the 0.2% better growth in sales might be a “tell” that the environment is improving. In a normal economic environment, small surprises like this can be meaningful and contain important clues to the future.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/stocks-bonds-and-funds/economic-forecast/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Economic Outlook &#8212; Better than Expected</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Economists closely examine how economic data differs from their forecasts, and draw inferences from these deviations. For example, should retail sales rise 0.4%, compared to forecasts of 0.2%, economists might opine that consumers were more positive, spent a little more and thus growth might be a little better than what was previously expected. Not a big surprise on the upside, but the 0.2% better growth in sales might be a “tell” that the environment is improving. In a normal economic environment, small surprises like this can be meaningful and contain important clues to the future.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">But, as I’ve mentioned before, this is NOT a normal economy. Unemployment is very high by historical standards, consumers are laden with debt, and governments are cutting back on spending during a recession. Therefore, everyones’ expectations are <em>very</em> low &#8212; so much so that even unimpressive economic data is actually better than expected! Take monthly employment growth, for example. As growth slowed last Spring, the economy went from generating 200,000 net new jobs a month to under 50,000. By fall, however, net employment gains rose to the range of 100,000-125,000 per month, surprising many and helping power a stock market rally. Not only do these gains pale with those of late 2010: they are even less the natural growth in the labor force of 250,000 per month. But in today’s environment, they pass as surprisingly good. What else has surprised on the upside? Retail sales, which accelerated from a 1-2% annual rate last Spring to 4-5% annually; US exports; new home construction; business investment; lower imports &#8212; the list is long! Despite record low consumer sentiment, the US economy continues to grow at a slow, but positive, rate. It looks like we’ll end 2011 with 2% real GDP growth, which is actually “surprisingly” good!</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Alas, it’s not good enough for 2012. While the US outlook is firm, dark clouds are gathering in Europe, where lack of decisive action by governments and investor fear of defaults have led to soaring interest rates on government debt. A toxic combination of fiscal austerity, and private spending cutbacks, will lead to a severe recession in Europe in 2012 and 2013. Asia is already feeling the impact as exports to Europe slow. While the US is the “best house in a bad neighborhood,” our 2012 growth will be impacted, and we’ll be lucky to escape without a recession and 0.5-1.0% real GDP growth. Unemployment is declining as discouraged workers stop looking for jobs; this will continue, and the jobless rate should decline under 9% even as their ranks swell. Will this also be a surprise, this time on the downside? Stock market weakness earlier in 2011 already forecast a 2012 slowdown in growth, as has the historic decline in interest rates to almost zero, so investors seem prepared for it. With consumers paying down debts rapidly, though, and a rebound in Asia, though, I expect the economy to rebound late in 2012, when the words “better than expected” will once again be heard from economists on the evening news!</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Christopher H. DeVoe CFA</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Constellation Asset Management, Inc.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/stocks-bonds-and-funds/economic-forecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reduced Student Loan Brings Big Tax Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/general-investing-tips/reduced-student-loan-brings-big-tax-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/general-investing-tips/reduced-student-loan-brings-big-tax-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Investing Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">If a lender allows a graduate to pay less than the full amount of a loan, that entire discount is considered taxable income by the IRS. Example: A lender agreed to reduce a student’s loan by $28,000 &#8211; so the IRS said that the student had $28,000 in taxable income. A court agreed with the IRS positions. What to do: Discuss any loan forgiveness or other changes in debt status with a knowledgeable financial advisor. Be aware the discount is not considered taxable income if the graduate works in certain professions for set periods in specified areas (such as a teacher in an inner city).</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/general-investing-tips/reduced-student-loan-brings-big-tax-bill/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">If a lender allows a graduate to pay less than the full amount of a loan, that entire discount is considered taxable income by the IRS. Example: A lender agreed to reduce a student’s loan by $28,000 &#8211; so the IRS said that the student had $28,000 in taxable income. A court agreed with the IRS positions. What to do: Discuss any loan forgiveness or other changes in debt status with a knowledgeable financial advisor. Be aware the discount is not considered taxable income if the graduate works in certain professions for set periods in specified areas (such as a teacher in an inner city).</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/general-investing-tips/reduced-student-loan-brings-big-tax-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naming a Trust</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/naming-a-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/naming-a-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Why would an IRA account owner want to name a trust or non-person as their beneficiary? One type of frequently used trust is call a “see-through” trust. It creates a mechanism for the deceased to control account withdrawals, post-death. In addition a see-through trust allows the underlying beneficiary to stretch distributions over their life expectancy. Prior to naming a trust as a beneficiary an investor needs to be aware of the complex rules that govern trusts. You also must name your trust as a beneficiary on the IRA beneficiary designation form or other form acceptable to the IRA custodian.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/naming-a-trust/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Why would an IRA account owner want to name a trust or non-person as their beneficiary? One type of frequently used trust is call a “see-through” trust. It creates a mechanism for the deceased to control account withdrawals, post-death. In addition a see-through trust allows the underlying beneficiary to stretch distributions over their life expectancy. Prior to naming a trust as a beneficiary an investor needs to be aware of the complex rules that govern trusts. You also must name your trust as a beneficiary on the IRA beneficiary designation form or other form acceptable to the IRA custodian.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">First you would need to confirm that the trust meets IRA requirements as a “look-through” or  “see-through” trust. It’s referred to as a look-through trust because one is able to look through the trust to the named beneficiaries. In order for the trust to allow for life expectancy distributions (“stretch”) all trust beneficiary must be individuals. Unless separate trusts are established for each beneficiary, i.e. the shortest life expectancy among the named beneficiaries will be used to determine the life expectancy factor that determines the amount of the required withdrawal which is then divided among the beneficiaries according to percentages designated by the trust.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/naming-a-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital Gains</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/capital-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/capital-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Reporting your capital gains for 2011 is going to be more complicated. You will have to use two forms. For 8949 and Schedule D. The reason? Basis reporting rules that went into effect for securities bought after 2010 and sold in 2011 and later. All sales will be listed on the 8949, and the totals will be carried to Schedule D. Separate 8949s must be filed for sales where the basis is reported by the broker, for sales where the tax basis isn’t reported and for any disposition where no 1099-B is received reporting the gross proceeds. This way, the Service will be able to cross-check the basis information it receives with the sellers’ returns.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/capital-gains/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Reporting your capital gains for 2011 is going to be more complicated. You will have to use two forms. For 8949 and Schedule D. The reason? Basis reporting rules that went into effect for securities bought after 2010 and sold in 2011 and later. All sales will be listed on the 8949, and the totals will be carried to Schedule D. Separate 8949s must be filed for sales where the basis is reported by the broker, for sales where the tax basis isn’t reported and for any disposition where no 1099-B is received reporting the gross proceeds. This way, the Service will be able to cross-check the basis information it receives with the sellers’ returns.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/capital-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donations</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/donations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Donating to a charity the right to use a timeshare is not a tax-saver, the Tax Court says. The unsuccessful trader and his wife donated a week’s stay in their Caribbean timeshare as a prize in a charity’s auction, and then claimed a charitable deduction for the rental value of the unit plus a portion of the maintenance fee. Unfortunately for them, the law doesn’t allow any deduction.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/donations/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Donating to a charity the right to use a timeshare is not a tax-saver, the Tax Court says. The unsuccessful trader and his wife donated a week’s stay in their Caribbean timeshare as a prize in a charity’s auction, and then claimed a charitable deduction for the rental value of the unit plus a portion of the maintenance fee. Unfortunately for them, the law doesn’t allow any deduction.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefit Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/retirement/benefit-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/retirement/benefit-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Several key ceilings on retirement plans will be higher next year. The maximum 401(k) contribution rises to $17,000 in 2012, up $500 over this year. Individuals born before 1963 can put in as much as $22,500. The contribution limits apply to 403(b) and 457 plans as well. The ceilings on SIMPLEs will remain $11,500. Folks age 50 or older in 2012 can put in an additional $2,500. Plan contributions can be based on up to $250,000 of salary next year. The paying limitation for defined contribution plans increased to $50,000 in 2012. That’s a $1,000 increase for Keogh plans, profit sharing plans and the like. Anyone making over $115,000 is highly paid for plan discrimination testing. And the benefit limit for pension plans is set to rise to $200,000 next year. There’s no change in the pay in limits for IRAs and Roth IRAs. The limits remain at $5,000, plus $1,000 more for anyone who was born in 1962 or earlier.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/retirement/benefit-plans/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Several key ceilings on retirement plans will be higher next year. The maximum 401(k) contribution rises to $17,000 in 2012, up $500 over this year. Individuals born before 1963 can put in as much as $22,500. The contribution limits apply to 403(b) and 457 plans as well. The ceilings on SIMPLEs will remain $11,500. Folks age 50 or older in 2012 can put in an additional $2,500. Plan contributions can be based on up to $250,000 of salary next year. The paying limitation for defined contribution plans increased to $50,000 in 2012. That’s a $1,000 increase for Keogh plans, profit sharing plans and the like. Anyone making over $115,000 is highly paid for plan discrimination testing. And the benefit limit for pension plans is set to rise to $200,000 next year. There’s no change in the pay in limits for IRAs and Roth IRAs. The limits remain at $5,000, plus $1,000 more for anyone who was born in 1962 or earlier.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/retirement/benefit-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>The tax rates are in limbo. For 2011, the rate on employees was reduced by two percentage points, to 4.2%, while the rate paid by employers stayed at 6.2%. But this cut is set to expire after Dec. 31. We think Congress will extend the break for <span> </span>2012 and possibly expand the reduction to 3.1% for employers and employees. The Medicare tax is not affected by this, remaining 1.45% on all wages in 2012.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/social-security/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>The tax rates are in limbo. For 2011, the rate on employees was reduced by two percentage points, to 4.2%, while the rate paid by employers stayed at 6.2%. But this cut is set to expire after Dec. 31. We think Congress will extend the break for <span> </span>2012 and possibly expand the reduction to 3.1% for employers and employees. The Medicare tax is not affected by this, remaining 1.45% on all wages in 2012.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>The earnings limits will be heading up, too. Individuals who turn 66 in 2012 will not <span> </span>lose any benefits if they earn $38,880 or less before they reach that age. Individuals between ages 62 and 66 by the end of 2012 can make up to $14,640 before they <span> </span>lose ay benefits. There is no earnings cap once a beneficiary turns 66.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/business-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/business-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>If you are a sole proprietor, hiring your spouse can cut your tax bill. The tax savings <span> </span>come from a medical plan. By offering family coverage for all employees, you can<span> </span>receive health insurance under your spouse’s policy. And if you have no other employees, you don’t incur an extra out-of-pocket cost. The entire cost of the <span> </span>medical plan can be deducted as a business expense, an Appeals Court says, as <span> </span>long as the spouse is a bona fide employee. In this case, a farmer hired his wife and <span> </span>paid her $100 a month plus health insurance. The Court sent the case back to Tax <span> </span>Court to determine if she truly was his employee. However, the odds on a favorable ruling are good, since she spent an average 40 hours a week helping with the crops, caring for livestock and keeping the books (Shellito, 10th Cir.). The business expense deduction reduces the farmer’s income tax and SECA tax bills.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/business-taxes/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>If you are a sole proprietor, hiring your spouse can cut your tax bill. The tax savings <span> </span>come from a medical plan. By offering family coverage for all employees, you can<span> </span>receive health insurance under your spouse’s policy. And if you have no other employees, you don’t incur an extra out-of-pocket cost. The entire cost of the <span> </span>medical plan can be deducted as a business expense, an Appeals Court says, as <span> </span>long as the spouse is a bona fide employee. In this case, a farmer hired his wife and <span> </span>paid her $100 a month plus health insurance. The Court sent the case back to Tax <span> </span>Court to determine if she truly was his employee. However, the odds on a favorable ruling are good, since she spent an average 40 hours a week helping with the crops, caring for livestock and keeping the books (Shellito, 10th Cir.). The business expense deduction reduces the farmer’s income tax and SECA tax bills.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">-<span> </span>Employer-provided iPads and other tablets qualify as tax free fringes, according to information statements of IRS officials, the same as cell phones that employers provide to their employees. Thus, as long as the iPads or tablets are given to employees primarily for business, personal use will not be taxable. The same goes where firms reimburse for the usage of employee-owned iPads.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/recent-news/business-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estate Taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/estate-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/estate-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annwolfson.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">IRS has finally issued the carryover basis form for large estates&#8230;Form 8939. Estates of individuals who died in 2010 can elect to pay no estate tax, but the heirs are stuck with the decedent’s tax basis for inherited assets, with a basis step-up of $1.3 million and $3 million more for surviving spouses. Executors use the 8939 to report allocations of the basis step-up to the heirs and to the Revenue Service. The agency said last month that executors have until January 17, 2012, to file the form.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/estate-taxes/" class="more-link">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">IRS has finally issued the carryover basis form for large estates&#8230;Form 8939. Estates of individuals who died in 2010 can elect to pay no estate tax, but the heirs are stuck with the decedent’s tax basis for inherited assets, with a basis step-up of $1.3 million and $3 million more for surviving spouses. Executors use the 8939 to report allocations of the basis step-up to the heirs and to the Revenue Service. The agency said last month that executors have until January 17, 2012, to file the form.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.annwolfson.com/estate-planning/estate-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

